propecia canada
May 20, 2010 by
Filed under ,
Last Tuesday, May 11, the Senate State Affairs Committee spent nearly three hours discussing how the emergence of social media has changed the way governmental bodies conduct public business.
These new tools can be used by elected officials to better communicate with constituents. But as Keith Elkins, a former Capitol reporter and now executive director of the , noted, elected officials could also use their cell phones, Blackberrys, laptops, and personal computers to communicate with one another in secrecy, outside of the state’s and the. He isn’t the first person to worry about this. Jason Stverak, president of the , worried earlier this month about the lack of archiving in new media: while public officials are more available to their constituents, the are also more available to each other through means that .
Senate State Affairs Committee chairman , R-, recommends the address how elected officials use the Internet to assure the public that no one is using the technology to or the Public Information Act. He also said public officials should not live in fear of being accused of violating the Public Meetings Act if they use electronic devices to communicate with others.
I wrote last week about the . Last year, four cities and some 20 local officials from across the state filed a federal lawsuit, supported by the Texas Municipal League, arguing that the penalties for violating the Act are harsh and unconstitutional. These penalties includ six months in jail and a fine of up to $500.
“We’ve got some good folks who are threatened with jail by innocent remarks or e-mails” said Mayor and League president Debra McCartt.
Of course, there are consequences for a law that isn’t strict. The improvements that went into effect this year have sought to remedy by setting up strict deadlines for compliance, and severe penalties for failing to do so.
It seems the answer is for Open Meetings Laws to explicitly state what is and isn’t acceptable, and to make clear what the exemptions to the law are. These laws need to address changing technology. It isn’t fair to officials for them to be unclear about whether their Tweet breaks the law, and it isn’t fair to citizens to be unable to access a Tweet relating to public business. Lastly, breaking the law needs to come with penalties that are strict enough to induce compliance.
Join us tomorrow on Twitter from 2-3 Eastern Standard Time to talk about Texas Open Meetings Law and open meetings laws in your state. Use hashtag #FOIAchat to talk to other transparency advocates about questions you may have or your experiences with open meetings. (If you can’t make it, our discussions are always .) For a topic schedule, look .
propecia canada
May 14, 2010 by
Filed under ,
Taxpayer money helps fund a lot, more than taxpayers know about. Cities use taxpayer-money to lobby states and the federal government (a practice called ““). Anything that government does should be open to the government, that is our stance. Unfortunately, this practice is anything but open and there is little information available on it and .
And taxpayer-funded lobbying associations are making it so that government is less open. In , the is under assault. The is behind an effort to get .
To put this into perspect: Texas citizens are funding an organization, which is encouraging Texas cities to sue the state, which are suing the state using the money of Texas citizens in order to prevent these citizens access to government meetings.
We’ll make sure to continue following this story. And make sure to tell us what you think.